Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 S.C. 164 - State v. Thorne

State v. Thorne’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1995

12 state decisions

501961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gardner · State v. Edwards · State v. Fuller · State v. Gilstrap · State v. Waitus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The determination of the relevancy and the materiality of a photograph is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge. If such photographs are calculated to arouse the sympathy or prejudice of the jury or if they are entirely irrelevant or not necessary to substantiate facts, they should be excluded.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.