Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 S.C. 232 - Margolis v. Telech

Margolis v. Telech’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2019

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

50196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Bailey · Elletson v. Dixie Home Stores · State v. Rector · Jennings v. Clearwater Mfg. Co. · Hogg v. Pinckney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deliberate, intentional doing of a wrongful act without just cause or excuse.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Malice does not necessarily mean a defendant acted out of spite, revenge, or with a malignant disposition, although such an attitude certainly may indicate malice. Malice also may proceed from an ill-regulated mind which is not sufficiently cautious before causing injury to another person. Moreover, malice may be implied where the evidence reveals a disregard of the consequences of an injurious act, without reference to any special injury that may be inflicted on another person. Malice also may be implied in the doing of an illegal act for one's own gratification or purpose without regard to the rights of others or the injury which may be inflicted on another person. In an action for malicious prosecution, malice may be inferred from a lack of probable cause to institute the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.