Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

239 So. 2d 39

White v. Testman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 3, 1970

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1970-09-03

Decided 1970-09-03

PER CURIAM.

¶1It appearing that the appellant has failed to comply with the provisions of Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(b), 32 F.S.A., it is, upon consideration

¶2Ordered by the Court that appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal be and the same is hereby granted.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
/239/so2d/39 · .json · Public domain