Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

239 So. 2d 854

Arnold v. McGrady

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 7, 1970

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1970-10-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1974

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1970-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellants appeal the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion for a new trial.

¶2During the course of the trial certain safety rules and regulations adopted by one of the appellants, Greyhound Lines, Inc., were admitted into evidence. The trial court denied the appellee’s requested in*855struction as to the legal effect to be given such evidence.

¶3After hearing the appellee’s motion for a new trial, the trial court determined that it had erred in failing to instruct the jury as requested by appellee.

¶4Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we find that the appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error and, therefore,

¶5Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
/239/so2d/854 · .json · Public domain