239 So. 3d 1074 - Chaisson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 135 S. Ct. 2584 - Obergefell v. Hodges · Dixon v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. · Pavan v. Smith · 798 So. 2d 1167 - Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Bd. · Stone v. Lakes of Chateau North, L.L.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'ministerial duty' is one in which no element of discretion is left to the public officer, in other words, a simple, definite duty, arising under conditions admitted or proved to exist, and imposed by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A public official cannot be compelled to exercise discretionary authority via a writ of mandamus and a writ of mandamus will not be issued in doubtful cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[F]indings of fact in a mandamus proceeding are subject to a manifest error standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.