¶1(dissenting).
¶2Even if it be assumed that the majority opinion states the law correctly, I do not think the petition as amended alleged facts sufficient to come within the purview of the part of the statute relating to the forfeiture of the car.
239 S.W.2d 449
Decided May 8, 1951
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · decided 1951-05-08
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1951-05-08
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1970
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1(dissenting).
¶2Even if it be assumed that the majority opinion states the law correctly, I do not think the petition as amended alleged facts sufficient to come within the purview of the part of the statute relating to the forfeiture of the car.