Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 SW2D 967 - Roland v. Murray

Roland v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1984

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

1101951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nugent v. Nugent's Ex'r · Drury v. Franke · Wilkins v. Hopkins · Western Union Tel. Co. v. Peter Neylon · Elliott v. Drury's Adm'x

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We cannot agree with appellant that this instruction submits extraneous issues or matters not in dispute. A green light, or ‘go’ signal, is not a command to go regardless of other persons or vehicles that may be already within the intersection, but is a qualified permission to proceed carefully in the direction indicated. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.