Harrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Helena Chemical Co. v. Wilkins · Morrison v. Chan · Barr v. Bernhard · Campbell v. State · Campbell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the proposed patient is a person with mental illness; (2) as a result of that mental illness the proposed patient: (A) is likely to cause serious harm to the proposed patient; (B) is likely to cause serious harm to others; or (C) is: (i) suffering severe and abnormal mental, emotional, or physical distress; (ii) experiencing substantial mental or physical deterioration of the proposed patient’s ability to function independently, which is exhibited by the proposed patient’s inability, except for reasons of indigence, to provide for the proposed patient’s basic needs, including food, clothing, health, or safety; and (iii)unable to make a rational and informed decision as to whether or not to submit to treatment; [and] (3)the proposed patient’s condition is expected to continue for more than 90 days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rodriquez v. State“Chapter 46C. Insanity Defense.” The 2005 amendment states that it applies”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrison v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.