Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 SW3D 809 - Bessey v. State

Bessey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Marin v. State · Mendez v. State · Burnett v. State · McDonald v. State · Anderson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court’s failure to properly admonish a defendant cannot be forfeited and may be raised for the first time on appeal unless it is expressly waived.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A law that puts a duty on the trial court to act sua sponte, creates a right that is waivable only. It cannot be a law that is forfeited by a party's inaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re CDH

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.