Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 U.S. 74 - United States v. Barnow

United States v. Barnow’s Empirical Analysis

239 U.S. 74 · 1915

Citation profile

220
cited by 220 later decisions
26
cited 26 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

141 federal appellate · 17 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 220 later decisions (26 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably McNally v. United States (1987), Hammerschmidt v. United States (1924)

141 federal appellate · 17 district · 7 state decisions

480191519201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses Haas v. William Henkel · United States v. James a Patten · United States v. Fox · United States v. Conrad a Plyler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 220 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ -x- -x- * ii js iftg ajm 0f ike sec_ tion not merely to protect innocent persons from actual loss through reliance upon false assumptions of Federal authority, but to maintain the general good repute and dignity of the service itself. * * * ””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]o “take upon himself to act as such” means no more than to assume to act in the pretended character. It requires something beyond the false pretense with intent to defraud; there must be some act in keeping with the pretense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whoever, with intent to defraud either the United States or any person, shall falsely assume or pretend to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States, or any department, or any officer of the Government thereof, or under the authority of any corporation owned or controlled by the United States, and [1] shall take upon himself to act as such, or [2] shall in such pretended character demand or obtain from any person or from the United States, or any department, or any officer of the Government thereof, or any corporation owned or controlled by the United States, any money, paper, document, or other valuable thing, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.