Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Va. 557 - King v. Forst

King v. Forst’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canron, Inc. v. Plasser American Corp. · Town of South Ottawa v. Perkins · Wallihan v. Hughes · Gilchrist v. W. Va. O. & O. L. Co. · Hunton v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he decisions of the highest court of a jurisdiction, interpreting the law of that jurisdiction, are controlling authority in the courts of all other States as well as in the Federal courts. This principle applies even where the construction given by the foreign court to its law is directly opposite to the construction the domestic court gives to its own law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.