24 Ala. App. 364
135 So 595
Decided June 16, 1931
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1931-06-16
Relies on Harwell v. State · Harwell v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-06-16
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1990
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Violating prohibition law.
¶2 “Rum” is a prohibited liquor. Code 1923, § 4615.
¶3 There was no error in allowing the state’s witnesses to testify, over appellant’s objection, that the liquid, of which he was admittedly found in possession, was “rum.” Harwell v. State, 12 Ala. App. 265, 68 So. 500, certiorari denied, etc., Id.,192 Ala. 689, 68 So. 1019.
¶4 The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
¶5 Affirmed.