Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Ala. App. 625

129 So 923

Culpepper v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1930

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1930-06-30

Relies on City of Birmingham v. Walthall · 23 Ala. App. 53 - Williams v. State · 23 Ala. App. 279 - Dixon v. State

Decided 1930-06-30

SAMFORD, J.

¶1 The evidence was in conflict, and there is no such preponderance in favor of defendant as would authorize this court to hold that the trial judge committed error in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

¶2 Questions arising on rulings on demurrer are settled against defendant in Williams v. State, 23 Ala. App. 53, 122 So. 460, Dixon v. State, 23 Ala. App. 279, 124 So. 506. and Weaver v. State, 23 Ala. App. 353, 125 So. 800.

¶3 There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/24/alaapp/625 · .json · Public domain