Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Ariz. App. 105 - State v. Quatsling

24 Ariz. App. 105 - State v. Quatsling’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District (1982), United States v. Venema (1977)

6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

14019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Harris · State v. Pederson · Recznik v. City of Lorain · United States v. Fulero · State v. Brookshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in front of the defendant's locker. The defendant later asserted that the use of the dog constituted an illegal search and therefore could not thereafter be used as the basis for the issuance of a search warrant. This argument was rejected by the Arizona Court of Appeals. That court branded as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.