Vigue v. Noyes’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Finneran v. Wood · Herbert v. Ziegler · 6 Ariz. App. 459 - Flynn Ex Rel. Eicke v. Lindenfield · Mungo v. Bennett · Arizona Livestock Co. v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [O]ne who possesses or harbors a domestic animal, which he does not have reason to know to be abnormally dangerous but which is likely to do harm unless controlled, is subject to liability for harm done by such animal if, but only if,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vigue v. Noyes“the propensity of horses to fight with and bite each other is a normal trait of horses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vigue v. Noyes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.