24 Ariz. App. 203 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2007 · most notably State v. Tuzon (1978), 26 Ariz. App. 24 - State v. Travis (1976)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dessureault · State v. Gonzales · State v. Trotter · State v. King · State v. Branch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The best rule for determining whether remarks made by counsel in criminal cases are so objectionable as to cause a reversal of the case is, Do the remarks call to the attention of the jurors matters which they would not be justified in considering in determining their verdict, and were they, under the circumstances of the particular case, probably influenced by those remarks. [ 105 Ariz. at 437 , 466 P.2d at 391 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.