Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Ariz. App. 239 - Everson v. Everson

24 Ariz. App. 239 - Everson v. Everson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Van Loan v. Van Loan (1977), Johnson v. Johnson (1981)

44 state decisions

20019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on LeClert v. LeClert · Rundle v. Winters · Lawson v. Ridgeway · Armer v. Armer · 7 Ariz. App. 307 - State v. Scofield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pension and profit sharing plans are a mode of employee compensation for services performed, see LeClert v. LeClert, 80 N.M. 235, 236 , 453 P.2d 755, 756 (1969), so that the portion of the plan earned during coverture is property of the community. Therefore, Rosanne is entitled to one-half of the value of these plans which was earned during the marriage. Herring v. Blakeley, 385 S.W.2d 843 (Tex.1965); Miser v. Miser, 475 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Civ.App.1972). Since the record is unclear as to whether the vested interest of $16,699.62 was entirely earned during marriage, upon remand the trial court is ordered to determine what portion of vested interest was accumulated during marriage and award one-half of that sum to Rosanne.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.