Barnes v. Vozack’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Co. · 7 Ariz. App. 590 - Baker v. Walston & Company · 15 Ariz. App. 406 - Green Reservoir Flood Control District v. Willmoth · 13 Ariz. App. 460 - Neeriemer v. Superior Court of Maricopa County · 21 Ariz. App. 186 - Johnson v. Nychyk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * an amendment that depends on proof of a transaction different from and independent of the transactions set forth in the original complaint will not relate back. Here the amended complaint alleged that appellants made false state ments in the exemption petition filed on May 19, 1970. The original complaint makes no reference whatever to the exemption petition and cannot be construed to encompass it in any way. Under Baker the amendment therefore does not relate back to the date of the original complaint. * * * ” 24 Ariz.App. at 546 , 540 P.2d at 165 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. Vozack
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.