Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Ark. 596

Ex parte Hawley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1867

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1867-06-15

<p>An appeal wilL not lie on a dissolution of an injunction, before the hearing of the came, there being no final decree.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1928

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1867-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Chief Justice Walker

¶1delivered the opinion of the court

¶2We have given to the voluminous record in this case as careful a. consideration as our engagements in other duties would permit, and the state of the record may require; and although much inclined to the opinion that no substantial injustice has been done in the proceedings of the court below, we would not refuse to grant the appeal, and upon argument and authority more thoroughly investigate the case, if there had been any final decree from which an appeal could be taken. But upon looking into the record, we find that the party seeks his appeal upon the order dissolving his injunction, leaving the merits of the controversy. undetermined. This is not such final decree from which an appeal would lie, as held by this court in Moss vs. Ashbrooks, 13 Ark, 176.

/24/ark/596 · .json · Public domain