Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 ARK 91 - Burt v. Williams

Burt v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1863

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2001

11 state decisions

30186318701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This is not the manner in which courts exercise judicial functions, is not a proper subject, or legitimate use of legislative authority, inasmuch as the powers of the government of this State are divided by the constitution into distinct departments, each of which is confided to a separate magistracy: the legislative powers to the general assembly, the judicial powers to the judiciary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “until after the ratification of peace between the United States and the Confederate States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.