Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 CAL2D 543 - Thomson v. Bayless

Thomson v. Bayless’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2008

22 state decisions

801944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 120 Cal. App. 561 - Silvey v. Harm · Hunton v. California Portland Cement Co. · Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · Scoville v. Keglor · 42 Cal. App. 2d 521 - Inai v. Ede

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The courts in this state have uniformly held for the past 12 years that a prima facie case of negligence is established under section 582 by proof that the vehicle was left on the paved portion of the highway outside of a business or residential district and that the burden to show that it was not practicable to drive off the main traveled portion of the highway rests upon the operator of such vehicle.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Upon any highway in unincorporated areas no person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle, whether attended or unattended, upon the roadway when it is practicable to stop, park, or leave the vehicle off such portion of the highway, but in every event an unobstructed width of the highway opposite a standing vehicle shall be left for the free passage of other vehicles and a clear view of the stopped vehicle shall be available from a distance of 200 feet in each direction.... (b) This section shall not apply to the driver of any vehicle which is disabled in such a manner and to such extent that it is impossible to avoid stopping and temporarily leaving [it] ... on the roadway....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.