In Re Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1972
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Tumey v. State of Ohio · Mooney v. Holohan · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Brown v. State of Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A violation of the defendant's constitutional rights during the trial leading to his conviction is ground for attack on the judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding if the petitioner has no other adequate remedy to test the constitutionality of the proceeding resulting in his conviction (In re Bell, 19 Cal.2d 488, 494 [ 122 P.2d 22 ]; Portnoy v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.2d 375, 378 [ 125 P.2d 487 ]; In re Silverstein, 52 Cal.App.2d 725 [ 126 P.2d 962 ]; In re Connor, 15 Cal.2d 161, 163 [ 99 P.2d 248 ]; In re Connor, 16 Cal.2d 701, 705 [ 108 P.2d 10 ]).” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Burns
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.