24 Cal. 3d 121 - People v. Valles’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 41 Cal. 3d 564 - Ballard v. Uribe (1986), Stokes v. State (2004)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Remmer v. United States · Parker v. Gladden · 17 Cal. 3d 687 - People v. Collins · 20 Cal. 3d 150 - People v. Honeycutt · State v. Bindyke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As in Smith , we do not confront the issue whether a defendant personally may agree to the presence of alternate jurors in the jury room during deliberations. See Smith, supra at 495 . We note that in Smith the defendant's trial counsel and the prosecutor agreed to the procedure pertaining to the alternate jurors sitting with the deliberating jurors. No such agreement was made in this case, although the defendant's trial counsel raised no objection. [8] Article 30 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights reads as follows:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[e]ven if only one regular juror observed such a response on the part of the alternate not necessarily from his speech, but from his gestures, attitude, or facial expressions it could well have a tilting effect on the ensuing vote.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he presence of alternates in the jury room during deliberations is not necessarily detrimental to a defendant's right of trial by jury and ... defense counsel may stipulate to such procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.