Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Cal. 3d 395 - Fare v. Scott K.

24 Cal. 3d 395 - Fare v. Scott K.’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably David Levell W. v. California (1980), 40 Cal. 3d 550 - People v. William G. (1985)

105 state decisions — followed in 12 states

59019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · United States v. Matlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]uveniles are entitled `to acquire and hold property...'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is equally well established ... that the liberty interest of a minor is not coextensive with that of an adult. `[E]ven where there is an invasion of protected freedoms "the power of the state to control the conduct of children reaches beyond the scope of its authority over adults.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[m]inors' rights are often legitimately curtailed when the restriction serves a state's interest in promoting the health and growth of children”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.