24 Cal. App. 641 - Vaughn v. Bixby’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1985
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co. · Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co. · Williams v. Miller · Howard v. Throckmorton · Rey v. Toney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Even if there be no conflict in the evidence, nevertheless, if the inferences fairly deducible therefrom are such that different conclusions might rationally be drawn therefrom by men equally sensible and impartial, the conclusion reached by the jury should be deemed final and not disturbed on appeal for want of sufficient evidence to justify the verdict. (Herbert v. Southern Pacific, Co., 121 Cal. 227 [ 53 Pac. 651 ] ; Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co., 158 Cal. 596 [ 112 Pac. 53 ].) ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dunlavy v. Nead
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.