Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 COLO 107 - Farris v. Strong

Farris v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
January 1960
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1960

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

4018971900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gage v. Lewis · Bethell v. Bethell · Fouty v. Fouty · Long v. Woodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The representations constituting- the fraud relied on in this case were all in reference to future performance; and although it is admitted that they were unfulfilled, and made with an intention on the part of Strong not to perform, whatever may be said of his conduct from a moral point of view, they do not, as we have seen, afford a ground for the relief sought; nor, upon the averments in this complaint can any other relief be granted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.