Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Conn. App. 811

State v. Membrino

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 1991

Connecticut Appellate Court · decided 1991-02-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · DeBarros v. Singleton · Sherbo v. Manson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-02-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The defendant appeals from his conviction after his entry of guilty pleas to three counts of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).

¶2Our review of the record, transcripts and briefs clearly indicates that the canvasses undertaken by the trial courts and their determinations that the guilty pleas of the defendant were intelligently and voluntarily made were fully in accord with Practice Book § 711. See also Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. 2d 264 (1969); Sherbo v. Manson, 21 Conn. 172, 572 A.2d 378, cert. denied, 215 Conn. 808, 809, 576 A.2d 539 (1990).

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

/24/connapp/811 · .json · Public domain