Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Conn. Supp. 319

State v. Vasel

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 28, 1963

Connecticut Appellate Court · decided 1963-02-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1965

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1963-02-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes §14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence.

¶2*320There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Eule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

¶3The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Eule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Eule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

¶4There is no error.

¶5Kinmonth, Dearington and Jacobs, Js., participated in this decision.

/24/connsupp/319 · .json · Public domain