Willimantic Linen Co. v. Clark Thread Co.’s Empirical Analysis
24 F. 799 · 1885
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 1913
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““application * * * for a rehearing, on the ground of newly discovered evidence * * * must be supported- by the same sort of proof as the court requires in order to give party relief upon a bill of review, or a supplemental bill in the nature of a bill of review, after a final decree.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheeler v. Alexander““The court has power to open the same and allow a new defense on motion, and without the formality of a bill of review.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheeler v. Alexander
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.