Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 F.2d 254

Docket Nos. 3656, 3711.

Dussoulas v. Lang

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1928.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1928-01-16

6 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1928-01-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1996

2019281930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

¶2In No. 3656:

¶3George J. Edwards, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

¶4D. Arthur Magaziner, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

¶5In No. 3711:

¶6Bertram K. Wolfe, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

¶7J. Henry Spivak, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

¶8Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.

¶9PER CURIAM.

¶10These cases concern policies of life insurance on the lives of two bankrupts. On petition of the bankrupts the court below ordered the trustees of such bankrupts to deliver the policies to them. Therefrom the appeals were taken. The two opinions of the judge below (In re Lang, 20 F.[2d] 236; In re Rose, 24 F.[2d] 253) so fully and satisfactorily discuss the question involved in each of the policies, which differ somewhat in terms, as to lead this court to adopt them as the opinions of this court. In our judgment he has properly construed and applied the statutes of Pennsylvania to both policies.

¶11The orders made below, are therefore affirmed.

/24/f2d/254 · .json · Public domain