Schainman v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis
24 F.2d 475 · 1928
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 1984 · most notably Klein v. Tabatchnick (1979), Mack v. Newton (1984)
14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Flanders v. Coleman · Brainard v. Cohn · 2 Cal. App. 233 - Calkins v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(W)hatever the form of action, or whatever the relief sought, the basis of the recovery is the goods or their value * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.