Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.2d 664 - Kaplan v. Hecht

Kaplan v. Hecht’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.2d 664 · 1928

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 1993

13 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

11019281930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte United States · United States v. Murray · Belden v. Hugo · Kriebel v. United States · State v. Everitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose [of probation] is to avoid imprisonment so long as the guilty man gives promise of reform. Clearly, therefore, probation is not intended to be the equivalent of imprisonment.” ( 24 F.2d 664, 665 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.