Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.2d 796 - Spirou v. United States

Spirou v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.2d 796 · 1928

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
October 1986
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1986 · most notably Berman v. United States (1937), United States v. Ellenbogen (1968)

31 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1201928193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosen v. United States · United States v. Cress · Connors v. United States · United States v. Pridgeon · United States v. Solomon Kenofskey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * -* The sentence is void merely for the excess. Dodge v. United States, 2 Cir., 258 F. 300, 306 , 7 A.L.R. 1510 . In Wechsler v. United States, 2 Cir., 158 F. 579 , this court, under similar circumstances, reversed and remanded to the District Court, with instructions to enter a sentence in accordance with the statute. We see no reason, however, why we may not adopt the less cumbersome procedure of correcting the sentence by our own mandate, as was done in Salazer v. United States, 8 Cir., 236 F. 541 ; Priori v. United States, 6 Cir., 6 F.2d 575 ; Goode v. United States, 8 Cir., 12 F.2d 742 ; Jackson v. United States, 9 Cir., 102 F. 473 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.