Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.2d 890 - Jacobs v. United States

Jacobs v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.2d 890 · 1928

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
6
states following
October 1988
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 1988 · most notably Jordan v. United States District Court (1956), State v. Harig (1974)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

1401928193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dumbra v. United States · Belcher v. Commonwealth · State v. Court · Maynard v. United States · Fry v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the fact thus relied on must be averred in the indictment. * * * As stated by Lord Campbell in the case of Reg. v. Clark, 20 Eng. L. & Eq. Rep. 682: ‘It is only the averment of a fact which may affect the punishment. The jury do not find the person guilty of the previous offense; they only find that he was previously convicted of it, as an historical fact.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"In a case where a party is proceeded against for a second or third offense under the statute, and the sentence prescribed is different from the first by reason of its being a second or third offense, the fact thus relied on must be averred in the indictment. * * *" Id., 58 App.D.C. at 63 , 24 F.2d at 891 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.