Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.3d 1032 - Whitmore v. Gaines

Whitmore v. Gaines’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.3d 1032 · 1994

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2017

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat · Byrne v. United States · Whitmore v. State · Whitmore v. Al Lockhart · Whitmore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[w]hen a commutation statute does not impose standards constraining the discretion of the board as to when clemency must be granted, the statute does not create a constitutional right or entitlement sufficient to invoke the Due Process Clause.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The power of executive clemency is one of mercy which may be exercised to commute a legally imposed sentence. In Arkansas, the Post Prison Transfer Board has no authority to grant clemency; its duty is to investigate an application for clemency and submit to the governor its recommendation regarding the application. See Ark.Code.Ann. 16-93-204 (Miehie Supp.1993). The recommendation is not binding on the governor and nothing in the Arkansas Code restricts the discretion of either the board or the governor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.