Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.3d 1145 - Parker North American Corporation Parker North American Corporation v. Resolution Trust Corporation Parker North American Corporation

Parker North American Corporation Parker North American Corporation v. Resolution Trust Corporation Parker North American Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.3d 1145 · 1994

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
December 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Freeman v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1995), United States Brass Corporation (1997)

16 federal appellate · 3 district ·

210199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 106 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 550 · 12 U.S.C. § 1441A · 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (Consumer Home Mortgage Assistance Act of 1974) · 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334

Relies on Katchen v. Landy · Langenkamp v. Culp · Katchen v. Landy · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc. · University Medical Center v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(D) Limitation on judicial review Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no court shall have jurisdiction over— (i) any claim or action for payment from, or any action seeking a determination of rights with respect to, the assets, of any depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed receiver, including assets which the Corporation may acquire from itself as such receiver; or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Bankruptcy courts have expertise in determining preference actions, which involve legal matters unique to the Code. 6 The [FDIC], on the other hand, has no special skill in determining bankruptcy questions and, in fact, would be under no obligation to apply bankruptcy law to a debtor's preference complaint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he FIRREA claims process does not apply to actions filed in bankruptcy court to recover preferential transfers, at least where the [receiver] has filed a proof of claim that exceeds the amount sought to be recovered by the debtor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.