Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.3d 1323 - United States v. Dailey

United States v. Dailey’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.3d 1323 · 1994

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

34 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Combs v. Plantation Patterns (1997), Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc. (2000)

34 federal appellate ·

2701994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Perrin v. United States · Brewster v. Derwinski · Sisson v. Ruby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the earliest panel opinion resolving the issue in question binds this circuit until the court resolves the issue en banc”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If the defendant committed a non-violent offense while suffering from significantly reduced mental capacity not resulting from voluntary use of drugs or other intoxicants, a lower sentence may be warranted to reflect the extent to which reduced mental capacity contributed to the commission of the offense, provided that the defendant’s criminal history does not indicate a need for incarceration to protect the public.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “widespread use of the Travel Act in federal prosecutions and judicial approval of its applications to offenses not associated with organized crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.