Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 F.3d 1480 - Jd Havinga v. Crowley Towing and Transportation Company Jd Havinga

Jd Havinga v. Crowley Towing and Transportation Company Jd Havinga’s Empirical Analysis

24 F.3d 1480 · 1994

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 29 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Correa v. Hospital San Francisco (1995), Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-Agosto (1996)

39 federal appellate · 29 district ·

4001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Remmer v. United States · State v. Simpson · White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security · United Families of America v. Kendrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no reasonable jury could have returned a verdict adverse to the moving party.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “grossly excessive, inordinate, shocking to the conscience of the court, or so high that it-would be a denial of justice to permit it to stand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “so grossly disproportionate to any injury established by the evidence as to be unconscionable as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.