Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania’s Empirical Analysis
24 F.3d 508 · 1994
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 34 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 165 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co. (1997), Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. (1997)
16 federal appellate · 34 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Patterson v. United States · Pelaes v. United States · Doerr v. Doerr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 165 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 56. Summary Judgment (f) When Affidavits are Unavailable. Should it appear from the affidavit of a party opposing the motion that the party cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify the party’s opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such other order as is just.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“explicitly provides that the party must file an affidavit setting forth why the time is needed[,]” and failure to do so”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“2. Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.