Noble v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
24 F.3d 582 · 1994
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Martinez-Villareal v. Lewis (1996), Smith v. Moore (1998)
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Murray v. Carrier · United States v. Frady · Pate v. Robinson · McCleskey v. Zant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“external impediment, whether it be governmental interference or the reasonable unavailability of the factual basis for the claim, ... [that] prevented petitioner from raising the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“had full knowledge of the facts central to each of these claims at the time that he filed his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.