Hammann v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
24 F.3d 976 · 1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Dalehite v. United States · Laird v. Nelms · Mid-State Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago · 84 Wis. 2d 455 - Merco Distributing Corp. v. Commercial Police Alarm Co. · Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a]n expert who supplies nothing but a bottom line supplies nothing of value to the judicial process.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.