Brunt v. Taylor

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-01-14

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-01-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Ronald Brunt appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Brunt v. Taylor, No. CA-00-730 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *214 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

¶3 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).