Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 F. App'x 235

Hockaday v. Clark

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 28, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-01-28

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-01-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Thomas Hockaday seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hockaday v. Clark, No. CA-00-387-1 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/24/fappx/235 · .json · Public domain