Veillard v. Mednick’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692G (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
Relies on Russell v. Equifax A.R.S. · Keele v. Wexler · Gammon v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership · Bartlett v. Heibl · Avila v. Rubin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n today’s world, a person does not need to have a Sullivan’s Directory or other legal publication to determine that Richard Mednick and Associates is a law firm. The unsophisticated consumer need only request a telephone number from directory assistance to determine that Mednick and Associates is a law firm Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shows this obligation to be due immediately”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.