¶1The motion for a new trial in this case contains the usual general grounds only; there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court will not interfere.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
24 Ga. App. 266
Durham v. State
Decided October 10, 1919
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1919-10-10
<p>Accusation of riot; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. May 5, 1919.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1925
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1919-10-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →