Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 ILLAPP 56 - Hanchett v. Williams

Hanchett v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1951
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1951

4 state decisions

1018871890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duncan v. Stone · Howitt v. Estelle · Kime v. Dale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Demand and refusal are only evidence of conversion in an action of trover, and if it is shown by the evidence that the goods for which recovery is sought were sold or otherwise disposed of by the person who had the possession of them, then the conversion is proven and it is unnecessary to prove a demand. Howitt v. Estelle, 92 Ill. 218 ; Kime v. Dale, 14 Ill. App. 308 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.