BABAISAKOV’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Nijhawan v. Holder (2009), Sessions v. Dimaya (2018)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1039 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Taylor v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant's failure to contest, during the criminal proceedings, a fact found by a preponderance would bear on whether that fact was reliable for removal purposes as well, especially in the absence of any showing in removal proceedings that there was error in the criminal proceedings respecting that fact,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Barikyan v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.