CABRERA’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3013 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Bearden v. Georgia · Williams v. Illinois · Pasquantino v. United States · United States v. Munoz-Flores
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e conclude that a uniform Federal definition should govern in determining whether the assessment of costs and surcharges constitutes a 'penalty' or 'punishment,' irrespective of how the State might characterize them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzalez v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.