A-S-B’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Huang v. Holder (2012), En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United States (2010)
16 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Huang v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service · Recinos De Leon v. Gonzales · Rotinsulu v. Mukasey · Noble v. Keisler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n determining whether established facts are sufficient to meet a legal standard . . . the Board is entitled to weigh the evidence in a manner different from that accorded by the Immigration Judge”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“); see also id. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) (“The Board may review questions of law, discretion, and judgment and all other issues in appeals from decisions of immigration judges de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]fter the Board has determined that the Immigration Judge's findings regarding the facts underlying the hardship claim are not clearly erroneous, it may review de novo whether the facts support a conclusion that the hardship rises to the required level,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Adeyanju v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.