Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 I. & N. Dec. 69 - A-M-E & J-G-U

24 I. & N. Dec. 69 - A-M-E & J-G-U’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
December 2023
most recently cited

45 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Manzur v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2007), Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey (2008)

45 federal appellate ·

870200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Li Chen Zheng v. Ashcroft · Borja v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gomez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Castillo-Arias v. U.S. Attorney General

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Depending upon one’s perspective, the wealthy may be limited to the very top echelon; but a more expansive view might include small business owners and others living a relatively comfortable existence in a generally impoverished country. Because the concept of wealth is so indeterminate, the proposed group could vary from as little as 1 percent to as much as 20 percent of the population, or more.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “too amorphous ... too subjective, inchoate, and variable to provide the sole basis for membership in a particular social group.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the context of the country of concern and the persecution feared”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.